LDS Tithing: Bare Necessities

LDS Tithing: Bare Necessities

In prior articles discussing the issue of LDS tithing I have covered how it is not a voluntary requirement for church members who wish to have good standing in the eternities as well as how there is absolutely no accountability to the membership for how the tithes are spent. Additionally, I have gone back to the original revelation on tithing given to Joseph Smith in 1838 and through a careful study of the contemporary meaning and usage of the language in the revelations demonstrated that tithing was to be paid on net income, after other necessary expenses were paid.

Recall from my prior post that the meaning of the language of the revelation on tithing in 1830 American english, further supported by restored scripture and current official Church handbook policy is the following:

“Tithing is 10% of income more than that which we have need.”

This statement raises a very important question – what is “that which we have need?” Many people might assume that net income just means the income that you receive after taxes have been with held or taken into account, while others may consider that essential household and living expenses should also be part of the net calculation. It is quite a quandary. 

The import of getting it right

Remember that members eternal families, celestial standing, and ones own combustibility at the second coming of Christ are at stake! Members have got to get it right. If you don’t pay the full amount owed – then you are not in compliance. There is no halfway into the celestial kingdom or getting just a little bit burned. President Joseph Fielding Smith, quoting Lorenzo Snow, confirmed this in a 1940 General Conference when he stated:

“How do you feel when you give a recommend to a person to come into our Temples who pays no tithing, who only pays half a tithing? How will you feel after this? You will feel that you are taking a sacred responsibility in doing that which God does not approve. He has said that the man who fails to pay his tithing shall have no place among the people of God. Yet here are these Temples erected by the sacrifice of the poor, and to give recommends to parties who pay little or no tithing, how can you feel to take this responsibility? I could not. Part of a tithing is not tithing at all in the eyes of the law that the Lord has revealed
(Joseph Fielding Smith quoting Lorenzo Snow, Conference Reports, April 1940, p. 97).

Clearly this is no trivial matter and getting it right can make all the difference in the eternities.

Vague Guidance

Is there a clear statement by the church of what constitutes necessary living expenses? If so, then it would greatly remove the anxiety and uncertainty that members may feel when trying to live the law of tithing as we have seen it to be defined at it’s modern introduction.

On the question of what actually constitutes a necessary expense Daniel Johnson of the Quorum of the Seventy taught in the 2006 October General Conference:

“There are many reasons that are used to not pay tithing, such as medical emergencies, debts, car or home repairs, educational expenses, and insurance. These reasons and others like them are very real and are lived and dealt with every day by many, if not most, of us. These tax our limited financial resources and, if we are not wise stewards of these resources, may result in the inability to meet our tithing obligation to the Lord.”
(“The Law of Tithing” Oct 2006 General Conference, lds.org)

While it is not specifically stated, the implication is that these bolded items would not qualify as necessary expenses. What one person feels is needed, another might consider a luxury. Should a person with a car payment on a spare luxury porsche subtract that payment from tithed income the same as a family making payments on a humble used minivan which is their only vehicle? Maybe not, but medical emergencies and insurance are things that most would consider reasonable.

Vague statements like these may have the effect of inducing people to choose to exclude those items from their net calculation but allow the brethren the ability to state that they never actually said that you should do so. When you consider the threat that you are under if you get it wrong, the pressure is on – it is safer to overpay than to be found to have “robbed God.” Elder Johnson reinforces this point in his very next statement:

“A lack of compliance with this eternal law is not to be taken lightly and can not only seriously impair our spiritual growth and development, but it can also limit the physical and temporal blessings that we could otherwise enjoy.”
(“The Law of Tithing” Oct 2006 General Conference, lds.org)

With these vague statements and implied threats for noncompliance, what is a member to do? In the absence of a more definitive statement on what is actually a needed living expense – it is safest to simply overpay.

Getting specific – a leak appears

It turns out that the church has made an explicit, clear, comprehensive and unambiguous statement on what constitutes necessary living expenses. They just don’t want members to read it.

It started with a wikileaks style disclosure where a secret handbook given only to Mission Presidents was somehow released on the net and made available on archive.org. The author at MormonDisclosures first wrote about the handbook and it’s implications for potential tax evasion in early December of 2012. While there was still some question of authenticity of the manual as an official church document, all doubt was removed a few weeks later when archive.org received a letter from the Intellectual Property Officer of the church requesting removal of the document, thereby verifying it’s authenticity.

It’s not sacred – it’s secret

The document was promptly removed from archive.org. Like so many things on the internet, however, you cannot put toothpaste back into the tube.

The nitty and the gritty

Most of the Mission Presidents Handbook involves the procedural details of managing a legion of young emissaries as they spread the Gospel of Mormonism abroad. There is, however, a very remarkable appendix at the end of the document which deals very specifically with family finance issues. It is appropriately named Appendix B – Family Finances.

Reads very differently than ones on LDS.org

The purpose of this chapter is to outline the specifics of how the  living expenses of the Mission President (MP) and his family will be provided for during the term of their service. The introduction states specifically that “the Church reimburses the necessary living expenses” for the MP and family and then goes on to describe some of the expenses that fall under this category:

“Necessary living expenses” include, but are not limited to those underlined in red. (MP Handbook, pg. 80)

Excellent! we are finally getting some specifics about exactly what constitutes necessary living expenses. Before proceeding it is important to remember where the money comes from that will be “reimbursed” to the MP’s for these necessary expenses.

Tithes are the source

Keep in mind that tithing funds are what are directed towards the missionary efforts of the church – including providing the Mission Presidents with their needs. Elder Johnson made this clear in his previously mentioned talk:

“How is tithing used? Faithful members of the Church pay their tithing to a member of their branch presidency or ward bishopric. Under the direction of the Lord’s prophet, these funds are then gathered and used to fund the growth and development of the Church throughout the world. Examples of the use of tithing funds are the construction of temples, the financing of the worldwide missionary effort, the building and maintenance of meetinghouses, and other worthy purposes.”
(“The Law of Tithing” Oct 2006 General Conference, lds.org)

This should be no surprise to church members. They have long understood that tithes are directed towards the missionary efforts of the church.

Modest Gifts?

Now examine the above partial list of what falls into the initial category of “necessary living expenses” – no doubt you will find that many of those items concur with your own view. There is, however, the inclusion of modest gifts in this list with the examples of “Christmas, birthdays, or anniversary” gifts. There are families that have deprived themselves of even modest gifts for these occasions so that they can pay tithing to the church. They consider these tithes sacred fulfillment of their commitment to God. They might find it odd that their sacrifice has been used to provide these mission presidents with the very “necessary” modest gifts that they had to forego in order to pay tithes.

Would the family that faithfully paid tithes and yet  is undergoing foreclosure of their home like to discover that the wife of a mission president received a modest necklace as an anniversary gift, paid for out of those tithing funds? Would the family that paid tithing, but had to forego Christmas gift giving like to hear that the children of the MP received a bounteous Christmas morning full of modest gifts at the tithe-payers expense?

I myself had some very sparse birthdays growing up, as my family had many children and my father worked several jobs to provide for us and it was frequently not enough. He always paid tithing on the gross. One year I really thought that I would get a surprise party and I wanted to make it easy for my family to make it happen. I asked to be able to spend the afternoon at the library. I thought that this would surely give them the time to set it all up. Upon being picked up and taken home I was asked how I liked my birthday. There was no party. My visit to the library was my gift. The children of Mission President’s will never have that feeling. (that being said – libraries are awesome and my parents earnestly did the best they could and I have no complaints. I loved my childhood!)

More Necessary Living Expenses

The section in the Appendix B continues to list other “necessary living expenses” which are to be reimbursed:

Reimbursed “Necessary Living Expenses” continued (MP Handbook pg. 80)

Here we see some other interesting items. Medical expenses are no surprise – most people would agree that they are necessary expenses. We will see later that these are expenses which come after medical insurance coverage.

“Support for children serving full-time missions” – while this is only to be provided if requested, I find it very interesting that it is offered at all. When I was young I was taught that it was my duty to save for my mission as a young man. Many young men would devote entire summers of work to putting money away so that they could fund their mission. In some cases, when the young man and his family fell short, members of the ward would pitch in by donating money specifically toward that young man’s mission. It was sacrifice on the part of all parties involved. Not necessarily so if you are the son of a mission president.

“Elementary and secondary school expenses” are an interesting category. Tuition and books are not charged in public schools and so tuition implies that the MP’s children will be attending private schools. This may not be surprising in foreign countries, however stateside MP’s do not appear to be restricted from this benefit. Extracurricular activities are another notable item in this list. There are families which have a difficult time including their children in public school extracurricular activities, many of which require that the family pay into. Additional voice, dance, piano, fencing, horseback riding and other types of lessons can be costly over the years. Many of these are not a common part of the academic landscape of people who struggle to pay tithing. Their struggles appear to be subsidizing a lifestyle for the children of the mission presidents that their own children are being deprived of.

“Undergraduate tuition at an accredited college or university” is quite remarkable. This is the best type of scholarship that one could ask for! It is true that there are standards for what grades are maintained and tuition is only reimbursed up to the cost of and equivalent time at the church sponsored schools but wow! There are families who spend the decades before their child is of age dutifully paying tithing while not having the money to set aside for their children’s college. This problem is compounded when you think of the number of children that Mormons are encouraged to have. It is simply an impossibility for some with large families of greater than 5 kids and normal levels of income. Sign me up!

Yet more necessary household expenses

For the sake of brevity I will present the pertinent segments from the remainder of the Appendix which describe “necessary living expenses” which are reimbursed to the Mission Presidents with the notable items highlighted:

Necessary Home Expenses (MP Handbook pg. 81)

Necessary transportation expenses (MP Handbook pg. 81)

Necessary Babysitting (MP Handbook Pg. 81)

Necessary Insurance Premiums are reimbursed (MP Handbook pg. 82)

There are a few comments to be made from this selection of remarkable benefits.

First, the mission home expenses are handled differently and instead of being reimbursed to the MP, the mission office pays these expenses directly. This does not alter the fact that these are necessary expenses to the maintenance of a home.

Second, it is notable that a “part-time housekeeper and cook” are in this list. I imagine that the many Mormon mothers who after giving birth to upwards of 4-5+ children could do with part-time help. The brutal reality is that the cost of so many children combined with the average income means that few if any of these moms will have that benefit. Yet they continue to dutifully pay tithing, believing that they are furthering the work of the Lord, when in fact it appears that they are in part subsidizing a lifestyle that they themselves have no hope of attaining. The high rates of depression among women in Utah may have many factors. I know from personal experience that the demands on a woman in maintaining a home with numerous kids on limited funds without any help can be devastating to their energy, minds and health over the long term. It is good to hear that Mission President’s wives won’t risk these pitfalls.

Transportation Expenses” are no big surprise. Many mission areas are spread over a large area and the expenses are an expected and necessary part of the calling. It is notable that family can travel with the MP and those costs will be reimbursed. If I was MP in Europe, Asia or any other exotic locale – you can bet that my family would come with me on any trips I took. Educational travel experience plus totally reimbursed equals “yes please!” Sadly, many people who struggle to pay tithing have never known anything of traveling to see the world.

Cost of A Babysitter” is a very reasonable thing to provide. After rigorous supervision of the part-time housekeeper and cook it really is necessary that the MP’s wife get a break from time to time to accompany her husband to activities. It would be a terrible burden for the MP’s family to provide that out of their own funds rather than the tithes that have been dutifully given for that purpose. This is, of course, sarcasm. I think that every mother who stays at home and does the primary rearing of the children should be given a break as frequently as possible and I don’t care where the funds come from. I imagine that tithing mothers who don’t get these sorts of breaks would rather that they not be the ones subsidizing them for the MP wives, but I may be doing them an injustice by saying so.

The Cost of Personal Health and Life Insurance”  – Forget Obamacare – I want LDS Tithing Care! Premium levels don’t matter – tithing will cover it. Deductibles don’t matter – remember that medical expenses not covered by insurance are reimbursed. Prescription medication fees? Who cares! The elderly member who may have stopped taking a needed medication because of the cost involved – yet still is a faithful tithe payer is happy to make sure that the Mission President gets his meds (and his family too).

Reimbursement

It is good to take a moment to think about the whole reimbursement arrangement for a moment. What does it practically mean?

  • The MP is responsible to paying for the good or service.
  • The good or service is received
  • The Church reimburses the MP the cost of the good or service.
  • The MP now has their original money PLUS the benefit of the good or service.

Good to know.

Tithing?

Okay, it has been very revealing to examine all of the numerous benefits that the Mission President’s receive from coffers that are filled with the tithes of members who sacrifice to do so. The question remains – do the Mission Presidents pay tithing on all this money they receive for these “necessary living expenses?”

MP’s do not pay tithing. (MP Handbook Pg. 83)

This should really not be surprising. Remember that tithing is paid on net income, which is income after all necessary expenses are paid. All the the reimbursed monies that the MP’s receive fall under the heading of “necessary living expenses” and so, as I previously described, it is completely appropriate that no tithing be paid on these reimbursed funds.

Certainly, as the above guideline indicates, if the MP has passive income from other investments, then those incomes are subject to tithing and should be paid as described.

Practical Implications

Now the above observations are vitally important to any church member. They provide a hierarchy of needs and tithing. If tithing should only be paid out of funds left over after all of these necessary expenses – then if you haven’t put any money into these necessary expenses and you have money left over at the end of the month or year – you should put money into these first:

  • birthday, Christmas and anniversary gifts
  • college savings accounts
  • life insurance
  • health insurance
  • housekeeper and cook
  • babysitting
  • emergency medical expense savings account
  • Private school
  • Extracurricular activities for your children

Seriously. If you have money in your account that you are figuring out tithing for and you have not saved or put money into every single one of the above items (and any more that you can infer from the MP handbook) then you should put as much money into those things FIRST and then pay tithing on what is left over (if there is anything left over).

Keep in mind that most of these things are things which the church has advocated that people be doing any way. Saving for education, preparing for unexpected medical expenses, providing for the security of unforeseen events are all aspects of family management that the Church has advocated in the past. Housekeeper, cook, and babysitting may all fall under the heading of supporting and nurturing your wife and providing for her physical and mental well-being. Toss in the fact that you are providing employment for another party and it is a win-win-win.

These are responsible, reasonable things that should be a part of every household that can accommodate it and would benefit from it. The Church has taught you the importance of these things – they just didn’t bother to mention that you shouldn’t take tithes out of the funds used to do them. You’ve been doing that voluntarily the whole time out of ignorance which was intentionally inflicted upon you.

After seeing the last article and this one you are completely justified by revelation, scripture and church policy in doing so. If your spouse or bishop raises any objection – please direct them to this article so that they can start modifying their own tithing calculations. Go and spread the Good News!

And don’t forget – the next time you shake a Mission President’s hand, ask him how his family likes the gifts that you have funded and how his kids are doing with the college courses that you have subsidized. Maybe check to make sure that he is happy with the Life Insurance policy that you are funding and ask if his housekeeper/cook is working out.

Why so Secret?

One thing that is remarkable about this handbook is that it is kept completely secret from the membership at large. I think that after the above analysis it is clear why. Many people looking at the example set by the necessary living expenses of the Mission President will re-examine their own expenses in a new light and it will have significant impact on the amount of money left over to be subject to tithes. But just how secret is the manual and this arrangement of reimbursed benefits?

Secret – not sacred (MP Handbook pg. 80)

Secret – even from your tax attorney and financial advisor (MP Handbook pg. 82)

You see, the Church forbids the Mission Presidents from even discussing this benefits package with their own financial advisors or tax attorneys much less other Mission Presidents or family members. This could even mean their own wife. Furthermore they are specifically told NOT to report the reimbursed funds for tax purposes.

See the above section on reimbursement.

It is noted that while the church assures the MP’s that all applicable tax laws allow this income to not be reported for tax purposes, not all countries have the same tax laws. If the fiduciary arrangement between the church and the MP is never revealed, as it apparently was not supposed to be, then no oversight and confirmation of it’s legality can be made.

There is rumor that this may become part of the recently announce case of fraud against the church put forth in the UK. Get the popcorn ready.

Mission President – the gateway calling

Keep in mind that the church describes this financial arrangement with Mission presidents in the following terms:

“While the Church provides mission presidents with a minimal living allowance, the couples usually have the financial means to supplement that allowance with their own funds.”
(New Mission Presidents Blessed for Exercise of Faith” Church News, 1 July 2011, lds.org)

If you compare what is provided to Mission Presidents with what a majority of church members have to live with throughout the world, “minimal” is probably not the adjective that you would choose to employ. Perhaps it is considered only minimal compared to the affluence that Mission Presidents generally seem to come from. (Have you ever met a blue collar Mission President?) The ability to accumulate and manage wealth may be a sign of a good administrator, which is part of the selection processes for Mission Presidents I will concede.

It is interesting to note that 4 of the 12 twelve apostles were mission presidents prior to becoming general authorities (Anderson, Ballard, Scott and Hales). The percentage of the Quorum of the Seventy who are mission presidents is not immediately known to me, but could be the subject of some investigation. It is not unreasonable to consider that since these mission presidents work under the supervision of area general authorities that their performance as Mission Presidents may have some bearing on whether they are recognized and promoted to general authority status. If they perform poorly it could only hurt and if they perform superbly it would certainly help.

Most people might say that Mission Presidents are typically older, seasoned managers with deep scriptural knowledge and in the later years of their life so that they can focus on the work. At least one recent example of a 35 year old man would seem to buck that trend. Ignore the similarity between the last name of that individual and other past church authorities. They are unrelated. Okay they might be related, but it doesn’t mean anything. Right?

Modest living stipends

When Church members hear about the compensation that other general authorities receive it is usually called a “modest living stipend”

“General Authorities give up their livelihoods to serve full-time, so they receive a modest living allowance—enough for them to support themselves and their families. This allowance comes from the Church’s corporate funds, not from tithing funds.”
( Lesson 75, D&C Church History Seminary Teachers Manual, lds.org)

If MP allowance is “minimal,” then this makes sense as “modest”

First of all, a church itself does not create anything of marketable value. Any money it receives, it does so as tithes predominantly. If those tithes are invested in the corporate holding of the church and the proceeds are used to pay the general authorities then saying that tithes aren’t used to pay the general authorities is just a matter of semantics. A distortion meant to deflect suspicion. What would be wrong with paying a modest stipend to the general authorities from tithing? That is what most members assume it goes for anyway. Perhaps if the allowance is somewhat more than modest, it would soften the blow to have it come from a corporate ancillary if the numbers ever leaked out. This is speculation of course.

If lowly Mission Presidents “minimal” living allowance includes all the various benefits listed in the MP Handbook as above – I wonder what level of “modest” accommodation full general authorities receive. Could it be that “modesty” has a different meaning to these general authorities? That may have implications for the hemlines and necklines of the dear sisters as well.

Conclusion

The Mission Presidents handbook is one of the first real glimpses that members may have into the lifestyles of the Lord’s Anointed. It is certainly instructive in establishing perspective when it comes to prioritizing essential living expenses as they relate to tithing, but it also demonstrates the extent to which church leaders exist off of the sacrifice and tithes of the members. Over the last series of posts I have laid out how tithing is instilled into the minds and hearts of members under threat of losing ones eternal family, burning at the second coming and is undertaken with no accountability to the membership. It is perpetuated with vague definition to encourage overpayment and the very precise information that would be needed to prioritize living expenses is specifically kept hidden from the members.

If you are a faithful tithe payer, I applaud you. I have no doubt that you do so with a sincere belief in God and a firm conviction that paying money to the church is the same as paying money to God. I ask you to remember the word of Christ in the New Testament. Did he ask people to give him and his apostles money so that they could do good with it? Or did he tell people to help others directly. Did he tell his apostles to gather collections from the existing members so that they could spread the Gospel abroad? Or did he tell them to go without “scrip and purse” trusting in the Lord to provide.

Much like wikileaks, the Edward Snowden disclosures and the Pentagon Papers – the Mission President Handbook’s availability to the members has the potential of encouraging positive change in the administration which it reveals. “Sunshine is the best disinfectant”

Update:

There are a few common objections which I think are worth addressing.

Objection 1: “They don’t pay tithes because they are working for the church”

Answer:  Church employees at the Church office building and numerous ancillary church owned companies all pay tithing on their income, even though they also work full time for the church. Mission presidents are not exempt from tithing, since they are still told to pay on income which they recieve outside of those reimbursements. This is very different from the exemption to pay tithing that the quorum of the twelve granted themselves shortly after formalizing the requirement to pay annual tithing in 1845

Objection 2:  “Benefits justified because the MPs have to move their families”

Answer: Many people have to move to different locations temporarily for the purposes of employment or service. The military is a prime example. Such benefits are still reported for tax purposes.

Objection 3: “This is not controversial – many companies provide these types of benefits to employees”

Answer:  This is true. There is nothing inherently wrong with offering these benefits. However, companies who provide these benefits report them as such and they are then subject to applicable tax laws.  The church specifically forbids the MP from even discussing these benefits with their own financial advisers or tax attorneys. That should be a red flag to anyone.

Objection 4: “This system is good because it allows people who aren’t independently wealthy serve as MPs”

Answer:  This is the best defense of this system. I think that the aspect of this which allows even a less well to do, yet spiritually gifted man serve is highly laudable. That is a separate issue from the appropriateness of some of the types of things that are reimbursed, given the sacrifices that are made to pay into the tithing coffers. This argument usually is accompanied by further rationalizations of “you wouldn’t want the MP’s family to go without gifts because an MP is not otherwise employed and has no other income.” If tithe payers sometimes have to go without birthday or anniversary presents in order to pay tithes, why should those who draw from the well of those tithes benefit in that way?

Furthermore, the secrecy of hiding this manual from the members takes on the appearance of something shady, when there should be no reason for that. The additional secrecy of hiding this income from tax attorneys, CPA’s and financial planners is just plain alarming.

This argument also loses sight of the fact that the fact of reimbursement and the secrecy of the whole things are just incidental observations. The real import of this document is that it designates what the church considers “necessary living expenses” which one should exclude from the total that tithing is calculated from. That is the real take home message for every tithe-paying member.

Update 2:

The title and header image of the original article were more ominous than necessary. They have been updated.

  • David T.

    This is a great resource chock-block with very well formatted details on the financial info of the LDScorporation. Thanks for your time preparing this!

  • http://centerforwomenspsychology.wordpress.com Center For Women’s Psychology

    This is fascinating. Extremely well-researched and articulated. May I make one suggestion? I really want to share this more broadly, but the opening picture of the wizard might turn TBM people away from even reading it, and I REALLY want them to read it. What do you think?

    • Thinker of Thoughts

      You make a good point. The first title and pic were done in a rush without much thought. I have updated it. Please share far and wide.

  • Mance Lotter

    Very well done. I love it!

    My only contention is the source of corporate funds. You assume corporate funds started with the investing of tithing funds (that might be incorrect). I think the corporate branch of the Church started when early (and current) members died and left part or all of their estate to the Church for whatever purpose they see fit. I believe that is where the corporate wealth of the Church came from. Again, I could be wrong, but be careful ignoring this possibility when postulating on the origins of the Church’s corporate wealth.

    • http://gravatar.com/rockwaterman1 Rock Waterman

      Mance, you are correct that some corporate funds are furnished through donations and wills. But as noted in the article, the Church’s missionary efforts are funded through tithes.

  • Marie Johnstun

    You know not of what you speak. I was a mission president’s wife, serving in Mexico from 2007-2010. The guidelines for mission presidents are generic in nature and do not always apply. For example, I did not employ a maid or gardener and if I had, I would have paid for them out of my own U.S. dollars. I did my own cleaning every week and once a year a crew of LDS maintenace workers came to the house to deep clean it. We left employment at about $100,000 per year to serve for three years which we did happily. During that time, we were given a small stipend to pay for food and other expenses.

    We also spent all of our own money (through U.S. banks and credit cards) to fly our children to Mexico to see us. We used our own money for gifts. We know of other mission presidents and wives who did not use the stipend at all. Many missionaries in the world would not be able to serve without financial help including mission presidents. Since many of us have not retired, where would we get enough money to support ourselves for three years without income? Unlike young elders and sisters who can save for years for their upcoming missions, mission presidents do not apply for the job — they are called and have about six months to prepare to sell their homes or get their financial affairs in order so they can serve anywhere in the world.

    I don’t know what your problem is with the administration of tithing dollars or with tithing itself. No one tells you what to pay or forces you to do so. I pay tithing willingly and count it a blessing in my life. Whatever those who are in charge of the funds do with it is fine with me. Once I give it freely, it becomes someone else’s responsibility to oversee, administer, and distribute.

    • Thinker of Thoughts

      Do you assert that this handbook is fraudulent? The letter from the Church Intellectual Property Officer would appear to disagree with you.

    • http://gravatar.com/thallewell thallewell

      What you did as a mission president’s wife has no bearing on this article. This article is about what the Church actually tells mission presidents the can do and what they can get away with.

      Good on you for being more honest about your time serving. That is a good thing.

      But as long as the handbook being cited in this article is genuine then the point of the article is quite valid.

      Do you dispute this?

      • Marie Johnstun

        What I did as a mission president’s wife has “no bearing” on this article. Really? My husband and I followed the mission president’s handbook as it applied to us. The handbook is cited here; therefore, what I “did” or experienced does have validity in this argument. Your statement about “what the Church actually tells mission presidents the[y] can do and what they can get away with” is ludicrous. We weren’t trying to get away with anything. We served and worked hard for three very long years and I absolutely dispute your statement about “getting away” with anything.

        As for the Mission President’s Handbook, it does exist and serves as guidelines for those who are called. What is written therein is general, doesn’t not apply in every situation, and is not a guide on how to avoid paying tithing or to divert Church funds for personal gain.

    • Jennifer

      The point is that the LDS church (in an official document deliberately withheld from the average church member) defines tithing as applying to income left after the necessary expenses are taken care of. And, according to the LDS church those necessary expenses include babysitters, a gardener, life insurance premuims, educational expenses for children, and birthday gifts among others. After you have taken care of these necessities then you can take tithing out of what is left.

      • Joseph

        I read the article, but I don’t see that definition anywhere. What did I miss? I’m not sure that “do not pay tithing on these reimbursements” = “pay tithing on what’s left after expenses.”

        • Jennifer

          The church definitively lists necessities in the mission president manual. And, the scriptures advise paying tithing on your excess income – after necessities are paid.

    • R Beckstrand

      Loved this first person, real account of a mission presidents wife. If you need an excuse not to pay, anyone will do.

      • Jennifer

        If you need an excuse to take other people’s money, any will do.

  • RMF

    My dad once gave me great advice, “Do what the General Authorities do, not what they say”.

  • Marie Johnstun

    Sorry folks, but this is not conspiracy-theory worthy. “It started with a wikileaks style disclosure where a secret handbook given only to Mission Presidents was somehow released on the net and made available on archive.org.” There is no
    secret handbook” for mission presidents. When we were called, we did receive the handbook but there wasn’t any document accompanying it that asked us to keep it secret, sacred, or private. All of our friends, family, neighbors, and anyone who was interested was welcome to read it. There was no restriction on privacy and honestly nobody (but us) was interested in reading it. Gardeners and babysitters (we had no minor children) and maids would have been lovely for sure, but we were too busy working day and night in the mission field to worry about such things. Again, the Mission President’s Handbook is a guideline covering many different facets of the work — not all sections, paragraphs, or sentences apply to every couple who serves in the calling.

    To answer Jennifer’s statement that there is “an official document deliberately withheld from the average church member,” the same could be said for “withholding” a Primary handbook from someone who doesn’t teach Primary. There is probably a temple president’s handbook, and MTC president’s handbook, and a temple visitors center president’s handbook. Why don’t I, an average church member, have access to those handbooks? Probably because they don’t apply to me. I haven’t been called to that position; if/when it happens, the Church will send the handbook, That’s it — that’s all, no secrets, no mystery.

    For anyone who struggles with this faith and this Church, please read “Shaken Faith Syndrome” by Michael R. Ash. It will speak peace to your mind and soul.
    As for what constitutes paying tithing, here’s the best official source I could find:
    Doctrine and Covenants Student Manual Section 119 The Law of Tithing
    http://www.lds.org.

    • Thinker of Thoughts

      Marie,

      At least one person on facebook who is related to a Mission President has stated that there was a one time payment of $100,000 made to the recently called mission president which helped them square away their situation and acted as the reserves from which initial payments could be made which were then reimbursed as the manual states.

      Does this story have any degree of validity in your experience? Was any form of initial payment, stipend or funds of any kind whatsoever given initially as part of the Mission President experience? It would actually lend credence to the assertion that the purpose of this arrangement is to allow people who are not independently wealthy serve – otherwise they would have no reserved to draw from for the initial payments which were to be reimbursed.

      I understand that as the manual states that the specifics of the financial arrangement are not to be discussed, even with family members, that you may not be directly aware of such things, but it is an interesting question.

      • Jennifer

        Well, and there’s the secrecy: Do not discuss these things with family or even your own financial advisor. The manual clearly advises secrecy in the matter.

        • Jennifer

          ^ And, if the Primary manual advises secrecy that would be interesting. None of the church manuals I’ve used have advised secrecy as to their contents. Which makes the admonition for secrecy in the mission president manual highly interesting and unique.

      • Marie Johnstun

        Thinker: In answer to your question about finances, we were asked what our financial status was at the time of our initial interview, as well as how our aging parents were doing and if we were parties in any lawsuits and other general questions. I do not intend to speak for others’ experiences, but my own opinion is that the Church would not consider someone to be mission president who was that far in debt. We were advised that we could sell our home if we chose to or not; others with whom we served in Mexico left employment with no guarantee of jobs waiting when they came home and they sold their homes in order to get out of debt so they could serve.

        We were also told to go on about our lives; that the Church had many good men to choose from for mission presidents (which I assume means that there are plenty of people who have sufficient finances to pay for their needs), and that the initial interview was exploratory in nature to see if we were willing and able to serve which is why I don’t think anyone would be “bailed” out of a financial bind to serve as a mission president. .

        When we worked in private sectors of education and business, we signed types of non-disclosure agreements about finances. That seems to be the status quo in business and employment. I imagine Church employment or service is similar in nature; that is, these matters are strictly confidential.

        So it wasn’t a big stretch to be counseled to keep our finances private as regards to being called as mission president and companion. I don’t know what others’ arrangements were and I don’t care to know. I consider it none of my business. I can assure you that we spent plenty of our own money during those three years and that was our own choice. We counted our service in Mexico as a blessing and a miracle.

        Even though some of the passages in the Mission President’s Handbook that you highlighted seem like more like getting perks than working (gardeners, maids, babysitting, etc.) I promise you that most of those items don’t apply to most missions. I think they may be included if the need or question arises, but they simply are not reality in a very challenging and busy assignment.

        Thank you for being respectful to my posts. I don’t plan on checking this site again.

        • Thinker of Thoughts

          I take it from your statement that you and your husband entered into a nondisclosure type agreement which prevents you from providing any further details.

          thanks for your comments.

        • Jennifer

          Is the office of Mission President considered employment by the LDS corporation?

  • Jack

    Another objection you aren’t considering. Yes, others who work for the COB pay tithing, but they are being paid to perform non-ecclesiastical work. The COB employs, for example, IT specialists. This person need not even be a member of the church. They are hired for IT skills. Mission Presidents aren’t producing “work” in the profit-driven sense. They are ecclesiastical leaders. I agree with much of what you’re saying, but this is a substantial aspect of the discussion that you’re ignoring. That said though, increase is increase.

    I don’t have a problem with the 12 receiving a stipend and not paying tithing. It seems silly to pay tithing on tithing money. But it’s really disingenuous to say they aren’t being paid on tithing, for clearly they are. The church has dug a hole for itself. Much has been said over the years about the leaders not being paid is a sign of the true church, and yet, they are paid. It’s common sense that everybody requires money. If all you do is church all day, gotta get money to eat from somewhere…. no reason to hide the fact and act like it isn’t happening. All the secrecy is troublesome though.

  • Pingback: Sunday in Outer Blogness: Literally edition!! » Main Street Plaza

  • Pingback: CS Lewis – A Modern View of Evil | Thoughts on Things and Stuff

  • Dale

    Under this definition, what church would actually have paid clergy? If working for the Lord constitutes a non-income producing circumstance, regardless of the level of compensation received, then any clergy would by definition be unpaid. The Pope would be unpaid, regardless of the extent of his compensation, etc.

    As to the level of compensation which General Authorities receive, we need look no further than Brigham Young. He had extensive holdings, larger and more diverse than any of the rich mining barons who came later. He was not independently wealthy when he came to Utah, but acquired it from the general funds of the Church, of which you could hardly claim that those funds were bequeathed. I’m not aware that any of his wives were spectacularly wealthy either, so they weren’t the source. Supposedly the Lion House was partly the Governor’s mansion, but he did not relinquish it when a new governor was appointed, so it wasn’t from the state. (Seems more like a cover story to handle questions by the faithful at the time)

    The disconnect is that the Church appears to encourage one standard of conduct for the general membership, but a different standard for the elite group which actually runs the Church. Whether it is honesty in finances or simply in being honest about historical events, members are held to the higher standard. Much the same criticism was leveled at the Pharisees, so the precedent exists of high-level corruption cloaked by official piety. There are plenty of warnings about apostasy in the latter days, but we are not told whether it will confine itself to the rank and file.

  • Daniel

    I would like to see the source for the first quote “Tithing is 10% of income more than that which we have need.”
    You say it´s in the current official handbook. I cut out the tithing part from the 2010 version of the handbook about tithing, and it´s not there. See attachment.

    • http://thoughtsonthingsandstuff.com Thinker of Thoughts

      Daniel,

      That is a quote from the earlier article linked to in the post which establishes that according to language usage at the time of the revelation tithing was to be upon one’s increase after necessary expenses. please see that article for details.

  • Dale

    A couple of points – Having worked at the Church in the IT department, it is true that it is not a strict requirement to be a member of the Church. Whether or not you are working on ecclesiastical things or not is a bit more of a gray area. Is the General Authority who spends his day working out whether to buy property or not working on ecclesiastical things? While working at the Church, we were frequently reminded that we were doing “the Lord’s work”. All of the work was thought of as helping to “build the kingdom of God”, so finding a dividing line to separate what work was ecclesiastic and what work was non-ecclesiastic is difficult, conceptually, especially since we are taught that all things have a spiritual component.

    If you had a title of “Elder”, you were clearly in a different class than someone who was a “Project Manager”, even though the day to day activities might be similar. My speculation is that the dividing line is probably set in place more by the tax code than by the concept of ecclesiastic utility. I suspect that attorneys for the Church help determine a dividing line that the Church tries to stay within, because they do not want the IRS poking it’s nose into the Church’s business. If you are on the ecclesiastical side of that dividing line, It appears from the manual that the Church zealously wants to protect it’s personnel from scrutiny by the IRS. The Church is essentially creating a demarcation between Church and state. I think the Church is trying to be reasonable about it so they don’t antagonize the state too much. They could easily be more aggressive and declare that anyone performing any work for the Church is performing a “calling” and therefore any funds paid are, like the mission president, not subject to tax, but I think they don’t want to push too hard for fear of the potential backlash of tax collectors re-defining that demarcation.

    That various manuals are private and not visible to all Church members is a minor concern, but a concern nevertheless. I suppose there is a difference between something that is “secret” and something which is generally unavailable, but it is sad that the Church has become so adept at keeping much of it’s operations hidden from it’s own members. Generally it is Satan that is famous for working in the dark; the Church is emulating his methods by choosing to hide it’s operations from it’s own members. Somehow, I have a difficult time seeing Christ running his Church in the same manner, but it seems fairly consistent with how I expect the Catholic church to operate. Have I been too hard on catholicism?

    I would have less difficulty with the “small stipend” argument if those stipends were published. It’s hard to understand how President Packer, for example, could acquire a home in a fairly exclusive neighborhood, on a modest stipend unless that stipend were far in excess of what his compensation was when he was a mere Seminary teacher. But, why would it need to be any greater than a Seminary teachers pay? But pay is pay. Most Christian churches are public about what they pay their ministers. Our Church derides them for that, regardless of their actual compensation, but refuses to call a spade a spade. That is the same kind of hypocrisy that Christ accused the Pharisees of. Some of these guys were very wealthy before becoming a General Authority, do they receive the same stipend as the others?

    I don’t understand this seeming contradiction in our leaders. I don’t understand how they are excused from paying tithing, regardless of the source of that income. Tithing is supposed to go towards building up the kingdom of God. It goes towards building churches, seminaries, temples, etc, so it’s not supposed to be about them paying themselves. Don’t they believe they should be contributing towards these things as well? It seems to me that if a General Authority needs charity, they should have to go to their Bishop and ask for assistance, like anyone else. If they are receiving charity from the Church does that strip them of the responsibility to pay tithing? What is the scriptural basis for any of this? Was the exemption based on revelation?

    • http://thoughtsonthingsandstuff.com Thinker of Thoughts

      Very good points Dale. As I noted in one of the earlier Tithing essays – even the KKK was open about their finances. If they can do it – why can’t the one true church also do the same?

  • Veracity

    I have read D&C many times now. To me it is clear that if your net worth is above zero and goes up in a year, you have interest, income, or increase. If not, 10% of zero is still zero.

    As supporters of the church, we will want to make sure our net worth is above zero and climbing.

  • DanLanglois

    I don’t share your paranoia about how the church administers its money, though I suppose that such investigations are performed on other non-profit entities, churches, businesses. In the end, your interpretation of this info seems rather opinionated to me — you’re not a tax accountant, or such, I take it. The central debate about what is the definition of tithing strikes me as just antiMormon rhetoric; if you want to know the definition of tithing then pray about it. It’s your life and you make your own decisions. It’s obedience to God, not the church.

    Reflecting on stewardship might do us all some good. You’re looking into how Missionary Presidents are supported, while they are serving a three-year stint at the request of church leaders, –while they are sent off somewhere in the wide world, having put their careers on hold. And finally, to quote the Book of Mormon, ‘I cannot tell you all the things whereby ye may commit sin; for there are divers ways and means, even so many that I cannot number them. But this much I can tell you, that if ye do not watch yourselves, and your thoughts, and your words, and your deeds, and observe the commandments of God, and continue in the faith of what ye have heard concerning the coming of our Lord, even unto the end of your lives, ye must perish.’

%d bloggers like this: